| Source: Michael
Cockrell - Dallas, TX August, 1996. This is the full text of Chapter 7 from a book called "The Lusty Texans of Dallas" by John William Rogers. It was published in 1951 as part of a series of books which detailed the history of prominent American cities. Other volumes covered Boston, Washington, Memphis, New Orleans, San Francisco, and Cincinnati. Chapter 7 is entitled "An Early Capitalist." |
VII --"An Early Capitalist" |
|
|
| "As Bryan began to drink heavily in the early 1850's, and
his capacity for civic leadership waned, a new personality rose in the community -
Alexander Cockrell, Dallas' first capitalist. Cockrell made himself so strongly felt and
his initiative, before his untimely end, so foreshadowed the spirit of the later builders
of the town that not only was he the next dominant figure after Bryan, but he was a
landmark in the city's history. Where Bryan had an exceptional education for his times and
was a moody dreamer, Cockrell was emphatically a man of action. Though Cockrell was ten
years younger than Bryan, their lives ran curiously parallel. Within a year of each other
they both went to live with the Cherokees, Bryan in Arkansas and Cockrell in the Indian
Nation. Cockrell was born in Kentucky in 1820, but when he was four years old his father moved to the frontier state of Missouri, where his mother died. Such was his independence of spirit that by the time he was fourteen , he had left home and gone to live with the Indians. Like Bryan, he spent some time learning their language, and he became an expert in the handling of stock. The Cherokees in the Indian Nation had two rival factions which fought each other and it was characteristic of Cockrell to enter into this rivalry and it was probably because he found himself on the vanquished side that drifted again into white civilization. Following some runaway slaves down into Texas, he was starting back to his home on the Red River when he paused to visit a cousin, Wesley Cockrell, who lived west of Dallas near Mountain Creek. Alexander evidently liked his relatives and the country, for taking time out in 1846 to take part in the Mexican War under Colonel McCullough, where he carried dispatches to Monterey for the army, he came back to make his home with Wesley and shortly afterward he married the daughter of one of the neighboring families, Sarah Horton. After his marriage in 1847, he located a claim 640 acres in Peter's Colony - where today the Dallas Power and Light Lake stands on Mountain Creek. Here he not only engaged extensively in the stock business, but carried on a freight service with ox teams going to Houston, Jefferson and Shreveport. |
|
| Cockrell was evidently a man of extraordinarily clear vision.
He observed the effect on Dallas of becoming a county seat and perceived the possibilities
in the growing village. He converted a portion of his holdings into cash and in 1852, for
the sum $7000 he purchased from Bryan what remained unsold of his town and the ferry
concession. Between the laying out of the village in 1845 and the sale to Cockrell which
was to become effective March 1853, Bryan had sold and executed deeds for eighty-six of
his lots. Moving from his Mountain Creek ranch into Dallas, Cockrell began a campaign of building. In its scope and thoroughness this suggests a modern promoter skilled in the way of cities rather than a frontiersman who had spent a good part of his formative years among the Indians. One of his first concerns was to deal with a problem constantly arising over the years, as the town developed - the jealously of its neighbors because of the things the community managed to draw to itself. This, the very first instance of it, grew out of the selection of Dallas as the county seat. The people living on the west side of the river saw Hord's Ridge as the logical choice felt a lingering resentment at the closeness of the vote and a very practical consideration kept their annoyance alive. Getting across the river to transact business was a problem and a trial, especially during the overflows when the bottom land on the west bank became largely impassable. Cockrell living on his ranch had been a west-sider. He knew just how those people felt and why. His vision of the coming events made it apparent that like it not, Dallas was going to become the center of the region. If people found it easier to cross over to Dallas, their irritation would subside and, as the town grew, their dependence upon its conveniences would increase. Shortly after he made his purchase from Bryan, Cockrell took steps to replace the slow
and awkward ferry with a toll bridge and causeway through the bottom land. Having obtained
a franchise, he himself set about building the bridge. He erected a circular steam sawmill
on the eastern bank of the river by the site where he cut the cedar logs. When the timbers
for the bridge were done, he moved the mill to the edge of his wooded lands (near the
Cadiz Street viaduct), to sell needed building material to the growing community. He
studied the land on the east bank of the river and bought the most desirable part, so that
most of it where the town was likely to develop came into his hands. He erected a two
story brick building on the southeast corner of the square, and by 1857, observing the
inadequacy of the town's single wooden hotel, he planned and got under way a hotel which
was to be the most impressive building in North Texas and which gained wide fame for its
comparatively luxurious appointments. Built of brick on a lot 100 feet square it was the
first three story structure in the town. With its spacious office, wide stairway, long
halls and rooms that lent themselves to public functions, it offered a hotel the like of
which the town and the countryside around it had never seen. |
|
| It is interesting to speculate upon how Cockrell would have
changed the face of Dallas had he been allowed to give expression to his energy and vision
for twenty years instead of five. But it was not meant to be. On Saturday, April 3, 1858,
he engaged in an altercation with the City Marshal, Andrew M. Moore, and lost his life. The Herald which appeared once a week carried a guarded notice of the tragedy the following Saturday. The story gives some of the bare facts of the encounter, but it is the antithesis of modern reporting in its careful avoidance of setting down details of the sensational case. Doubtless all during the week these had been discussed and rediscussed in hushed voices by its readers, the reason for leaving them out was not because the news was stale. Nor was the carefully phrased account which appeared tucked away inconspicuously in the Herald in the middle of the third of its four pages there because public interest in the affair had died down. The exact manner in which the paper published the news of the duel is worth noting, for
it is as striking an illustration as one could find of an attitude which was
characteristic of the community not only then but in later years. The code of honor with
which men grew up in this frontier land brooked no rash public discussion of what was
considered a man's private business. Under the heading "Fatal Rencontre" (the
frequent use of French words found in early Dallas newspapers was characteristic of
journalism throughout the South at that time), the Herald reports: |
|
|
|
| The word of mouth story that has come down in the town appears
to fit the facts so guardedly hidden by the Herald. In it, the occasion of the
"rencontre" was in itself to trifling to have caused any serious complication
under any ordinary circumstances. But back of the meeting was a grudge. There already
existed smoldering hard feelings between the two men for Cockrell had loaned money to
Moore and unable to collect it was turning to law in the matter. Angered and resentful,
Moore seized upon the "rencontre" in his official capacity rudely to press
Cockrell. Cockrell was a man of proven courage and not one to accept an affront to his
dignity. The Herald account says that he like the marshal was armed with a double barrel
shotgun and a revolver. When the town officer attempted to assert his authority in such an
ill-advised fashion, doubtless one thing that precipitated events was a certain
nervousness on Moore's part as to how Cockrell would receive his undiplomatic intrusion.
Thus a situation which with tact would probably have been a minor, forgotten incident
became a tragedy for a wife and three small children and the town as well. It is in
keeping with the firmness of purpose and character of Mrs. Cockrell that she carried
through her husband's determination to collect an honest debt. A letter exists from her
attorney written after the shooting which indicates a judgment against the debtor was
given by the jury and which says that the money will be paid to her as soon as it can be
"collected off of Moore." Moore eventually got from under the courts in the
murder charge and lived for ten years after the "fatal rencontre." The newspaper that carried the story of Cockrell's death also carried his advertisement for lumber from his sawmill, for in spite of the fact that Cockrell himself could not read, his keen mind grasped the power of the press and made use of it in his business. Doubtless he was able to do so much through the help of his wife, Sarah, who kept his accounts for him, read him what was necessary and wrote his letters. She had a native intelligence which in the eleven years of her married life taught her much about the procedure that had made Cockrell a successful man of affairs. When she was left a widow with three children under eight years of age, she resolutely set about managing the affairs that had been so abruptly thrust into her hands. She brought the hotel to completion, and for many years, in spite of the conflagration in 1860 which wiped out her new hotel before it was a year old and much of her other property, was a force in the community. She fitted out another hotel and added a flower mill to the enterprises which her husband had left her. She placed the toll bridge in charge of a Negro family slave. The name of this faithful man deserves to be recorded. It was Berry Derrit. Berry tended the bridge collecting the tolls until the west section collapsed in August, 1858, when Mrs. Cockrell revived the ferry concession which her husband had purchased from Bryan. The boat had been kept in repair and anchored in deep water to be used when the river occasionally overflowed the causeway through the bottoms. The ferry was also turned over to Berry who refused his freedom when emancipation came and continued to act as ferryman until a new bridge was built in 1872. |
|